/, NCAA FB/Granted a Six-Pack of College Football Changes: What Would You Do?

Granted a Six-Pack of College Football Changes: What Would You Do?

“Ah, beer.  The cause of and the solution to all of life’s problems.” – Homer Simpson

You’ve been granted a six-pack of beers – gratis – one per solution.  Your assignment: to generate six ways in which you think college football can and would be better than it is today.

Simple as that?

Not so fast… there are three stipulations:sixpackquestions

One: It doesn’t have to be a rule on the field – it can be anything – anything at all.

Two: This is a BIG one…ONE of your choices CANNOT BE A PLAYOFF SYSTEM – because that’s what every college football nut wants.

Three: Try to keep a clear mind and oh yeah… let’s not go hoppin’ in any automobiles after all of these suds puppies, comprende?

Ready?  Do you have the ‘suds’ to come up with a list?  I do…

6 College Football Rule Changes That Should Be Made

[Hiss-Pop!]

Beer #1: A Few Quick Rule ‘Tweak-ifications’

I mostly have positive feelings on the way the college game is being played.  For example, the college game’s overtime rules run circles around the NFL.  If you’re not with me there, then go flip a coin.

Yet, there are a few changes that I would make – a few ‘tweak-ifications’ if you will.  I’ll quickly touch on three: pass interference, ‘down when down’ and excessive celebration.

To explain: that damn 15 yard penalty on pass interference – this should be a spot foul.  If a guy is clearly beat on a deep play, then why not mug him?  It’s ridiculous.  Then there’s the “down when down” rule – c’mon, a slip in the open field and the play is over?  Finally, there’s the excessive celebration rule – which needs to be tweaked, especially since it’s causing teams victories.  This one is a blog upon itself – and a rule that hardly leaves me jumping out of my seat.

[Down the Hatch!]

Beer #2: Give All Preseason Rankings ‘The Ax’

Listen, prognosticators can rank teams until they’re blue in the face.  Go ahead, let Lou Holtz put Notre Dame #1 from 2010 through 2015 – that’s fine.  Let’s just not make these polls official until month two – because it causes too much illegitimate variation.  Teams that are “great on paper” wind up sticking around, even though they should be falling into the toilet – like Mike Leach’s career – and that’s not fair.

Let’s instead pick a date – say the weekend where most teams are beginning to move into conference play – and start up the official polls then, based on how each team performed non-conference, weighing in the quality of their opponents, margin of victory and so on.

[Third one down, pass it around…]

Beer #3: Eliminate the “Field of Nightmares”

What’s the most important thing to you when you turn on a college football game?  Besides winning, of course?  I’ll answer that for you – it’s the quality of play and the safety of the players.

This is where I get blown away by how much the moneymakers in all this mess are milking the use of college football stadiums these days.  There’s no better example than what happened in Orlando (Florida Citrus Bowl Stadium) during the end of last season.

It was a joke – the place was way overused.  First, you had a series of high school championships played there, followed by bowl games – yes, that’s plural.  With Wisconsin and Miami playing, then Penn State and LSU on the field a few days later – you saw a completely trashed playing surface and a series of unfortunate injuries by a number of players – not to mention slow and sloppy play.

The NCAA needs to slap this concept on the wrist, and soon.

[Crack…glug…glug…glug…]

Beer #4: The Transfer Process Needs A Transformation

While I don’t have exact stats for the number of approved school transfer cases – I do know the percentage is minuscule.  We’re talking tiny – like Michigan’s conference win total these days.

Here’s the deal: a kid commits to a school, a program and a way of life.  Often, they sign into a situation that fits the way they play, the way they live and so on.  Once a regime changes, often that can completely do a 180 on a guy – and the kid should have the option to transfer to another school (in these specific conditions) without adhering a one-year penalty.  Bear in mind, I realize there’s a fine line here and people can’t just randomly change their minds – or “pull a Florida” – cough Urban Meyer cough Billy Donovan.

There should be more cases granted – and I’d like to see changes going forward, instead of having all these talents move on to FCS schools that we never see on television.

[Pass me some more frothy goodness, would ya?]

Beer #5: Someone Please Blow the Whistle On The Review Process

The review process has gotten out of hand.  There needs to be more structure.  In some games, there are far too many reviews – and while I get an officiating crew wanting to put out a drama–free product, there needs to be some human review still intact.

We need to instill some kind of structured limitation on reviews.  With every play potenteially subject to booth review, it becomes “Snoresville” for the fans.  Put a cap on reviews – give some power back to the officials.

[Hiss-Pop!]

Beer #6: Split Screen TV – Regional Equality = Countrywide Knowledge

What’s the biggest complaint by many?

Exposure!

Your team isn’t on TV here, or this team doesn’t get enough respect in the polls.  It isn’t an easy problem to solve, because TV ratings are important to the game, and therefore, regional networks will only put the local teams on the big screen.

Here’s an option: two additional split screen channels on a national sports network.  One with two games top and bottom – featuring the north and the south – a northern team (say Big Ten) and a southern team (say the SEC).  The other channel would feature an east (ACC) and west team (Pac-10).  Depending on where you are regionally, you could potentially satisfy the “red tape” by promoting a regional school, while also giving exposure to a team that many never see on TV.

The result is more exposure for the pollsters and more exposure for the fans – therefore equaling more widespread knowledge of the game.

OK, so it’ll probably never happen – but dammit, if it does, I want credit coming my way.

[That is…hiccup…that is…hiccup…all for today…]

 

Six changes – all as clear as JoePa’s vision.

Now it’s your turn.

 

** Note: In no way do I condone excessive drinking, specifically underage drinking.  However, I realize that college football and beer do tend to mix.  After all, my friend has the t-shirt (“A Drinking Town with a Football Problem”) to prove it.”*

 

Be Sociable, Share!
By | 2017-08-25T17:35:14+00:00 March 9th, 2010|Kevin Paul, NCAA FB|9 Comments

About the Author:

9 Comments

  1. aero March 16, 2010 at 10:02 AM

    Hey Kev,

    I don’t write much, but I just posted a piece over at Fox about the Rays. Baseball is about the only thing that I can get worked up enough to write about. Otherwise I just troll around and enjoy writers like you who know what their doing.

  2. admin March 14, 2010 at 8:20 PM

    ‘REV’–

    Ha ha… nice. Yeah, you know… sometimes it’s the posts that you put together in the quickest timeframe that do the best. In particular, a while back on the FOX blog, two of my most popular pieces were the “Long Lost Letters” and the “Les MIles Rant”… both were huge if you will recall and I wrote those in under an hour… the humor one was on the train the morning going into work.

  3. Chris Humpherys March 12, 2010 at 10:36 AM

    That’s actually the piece that got picked up by SI.com.

    I actually didn’t get much sleep before writing that one so apparently sleep deprivation is good for the mind.

    Remember that while making your Final Four picks.

  4. admin March 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM

    AERO–

    Ha ha, I miss chatting sports with you… no doubt about that one. Are you still writing over at Fox or what’s the story? Let me know- send me a link…

    I like where your head’s at with some of these by the way.

  5. admin March 12, 2010 at 9:00 AM

    “REV”–

    Nice, I think I may have seen that post before and totally agreed with you. You wrote it a while back right? I’ll go check it out again…
    Glad we’re on the same page with the transfer rule though – I think it’s crazy.

  6. aero March 11, 2010 at 9:06 AM

    1. More girl cheerleaders
    2. Less guy cheerleaders
    3. Any coach inciting a riot on the field (Richt) should be beaten on the spot.
    4. Do something about the big ten (there’s 11 for crying out loud)
    5. If the mid-level teams want more respect join a major conference(see #4)
    6. Suspend Lou Holtz until Notre Dame wins 9 games.

  7. Chris Humpherys March 11, 2010 at 3:34 AM

    I totally agree with the transfer rule, K. The kids have no rights.

    One thing I’d change for certain… let the kids celebrate after scoring a touchdown.

    http://sportschump.net/2009/10/04/making-the-case-for-excessive-celebration-in-college-football/1728/

  8. admin March 9, 2010 at 9:15 PM

    Hey John…

    Conference championships was on my list when I first started this – so therefore, I obviously agree with you. I took it out because it didn’t fit in my idea. But still, following the Big Ten closely over the last number of years, I’ve always felt that adding a conference championship would benefit the conference… and now there are obviously some talks under way, but who knows if and when that will be all sorted out.

    As for Notre Dame, well… they don’t seem to want to be in a conference. The Big Ten tried to court them and gave up…

  9. John March 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM

    Large conferences without a conference championship. I guess there are only a few, but conference championships give some credibility to who is the best. The larger conferences (I guess most of them by now) make it impossible to have all the teams play each other. Championships for all conferences makes the conference winner seem a bit more legitimate.

    Also, a small one, but Notre Dame and the love that is shown to them. Put them in a conference already and make them part of the rest of college football. I am just sayin…

Comments are closed.